Profgrape, Wiltshire,
Anyone here actually thought about the ramifications of what it means that the No-God collapses Subject and Object? Those two terms are found in philosophy and psychology. Here comes another crackpot In my halfhanded understanding of them, mostly as they relate to psychology (and grammar and philosphy), is that the Subject is the unique experince of consciousness, an entity acting upon and observingthe world, while the object is the world outside, the thing observed and acted upon.
Hence, for all intents and purposes, the soul of the No-God is blind to the uniqueness of his experience and the outside world. So that's why we get all the ''Tell me. What do you see. What am I?'' I don't know all the consequences from a hypothetical collapsing of subject and object and how such a soul can still talk and have an idea of I... but it seems to me, that in a sense, (with all of Bakker writing about blindness) the No-God, by being completely blind to himself is absolutely overcome by the darkness that comes before, but he is also blind to the world.
In a metaphysical sense, such completely blindness can render the No-God invisible to the Gods and the Outside, because he is without agenticity nor awareness to the complete destruction caused by him. His lack of uniqueness of experience and blindness to the outside world is perhaps the key that allows him to be of one with the Horde and perhaps experience the world through their eyes (this seems like an eerie, dark inversion of the Thousandfold Thought? In a sense, has not the soul of the No-God grasped the Absolute as it is a soul unmoved by itself and the world?
And does complete blindness of Self and the World relieve one of all sin?