I was struck by the exact wording that Harapior used:
"Emilidis himself wrought this," he said. "No one who has tested it has survived...You would die were you to shed the least light of Meaning...Certainly! To suppose otherwise would be to blaspheme the Artisan."
It's the "Certainly" that upsets me, since it seems like one of Bakker's "tells."
And yet we're given no reasons to doubt the Artisan's craft.
I had thought that using a Metagnostic variant of a Gnostic Cant by substituting an additional inutteral string for the spoken string might defeat the Agonic Collar, but Harapior didn't say "least light of Meaning pass your lips," or "utter the least light of Meaning," etc.
I'm guessing that Canting at all will "shed" Meaning, so the Collar doesn't require the full Lo Pan to activate.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--2Eh4Jdo04When Harapior is taunting her ("Sing for us, witch!") the text says that "She did not sing simply because the watch
she had sung for had come and gone."
Why the emphasis, there, if not to set up and explain some future collusion?
I'd prefer it if the "fire and ruin" she "commands" actually comes from the Quya, at least at first. Harapior is among the Quya, and it seems likely her other listeners were drawn from them.
Maybe Vippol the Elder? I'd like to see what it takes to be "the most gifted of the surviving Quya."